SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Joint Venture of Lex Oilfield Solutions Ltd & CFAO Kenya Ltd v Public Procurement Administrative Review Board & 4 others (Civil Appeal 022 of 2022) [2022] KECA 424 (KLR) (4 March 2022) (Judgment)

[2022] KECA 424 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
424
Citation
[2022] KECA 424 (KLR)
Decided
4 March 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the Judgement and Decree of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Ndungu, J.) dated 12th January 2022 in Judicial Review Misc. Application No. 156 of 2021CoramM'INOTI, Ndungu
Holding

The High Court's decision was a nullity as it was rendered outside the time prescribed in section 175 of the Public Procurement and Administrative Review Act.

Facts

The Joint Venture of Lex Oilfield Solutions Ltd and CFAO Kenya Ltd was an unsuccessful bidder in a tender for the improvement of circulation water system at Olkaria II Power Station and compaction grouting. The Public Procurement Administrative Review Board (PPARB) struck out the request for review on the basis that CFAO had disowned the request for review.

Issues

  1. whether the High Court had jurisdiction to continue to hear the appellant's application after 45 days from when it was filed
  2. whether the High Court's decision was a nullity

Reasoning

The Court addressed the issue at length in the Aprim case, concluding that a decision of the High Court rendered outside the time prescribed in section 175(3) of the Public Procurement and Administrative Review Act is a nullity.

Outcome

Affirmed

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Public Procurement and Administrative Review Act
Cases cited (1)
  • Aprim case
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case