SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Keziah & another (Personal Representatives of the Late Isaac Macharia Mutunga) v Lochab Transport Limited (Civil Appeal 82 of 2018) [2022] KECA 477 (KLR) (18 March 2022) (Judgment)

[2022] KECA 477 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
477
Citation
[2022] KECA 477 (KLR)
Decided
18 March 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureSecond AppealCoramD. K. MUSINGA, HANNAH OKWENGU, ASIKE-MAKHANDIA
Holding

The appeal is dismissed. The High Court's judgment is set aside and the appeal is allowed.

Facts

The appellants, Keziah and Mukui, are the personal representatives of the estate of the late Isaac Macharia Mutunga. The respondent, Lochab Transport Limited, was involved in a road traffic accident with a vehicle registered as CHS-ST-190-4048254 Yuasa, resulting in the death of the late Isaac Macharia Mutunga.

Issues

  1. Whether the High Court erred in law by misdirecting itself on the question of the respondent's negligence
  2. Whether the High Court shifted the burden of proof to the appellants
  3. Whether the High Court demanded corroboration
  4. Whether the High Court required the appellants to have taken out third-party proceedings
  5. Whether the High Court misapplied the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur

Reasoning

The Court found that the High Court's decision was based on no evidence and a misapprehension of the facts, and that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur was inapplicable in the circumstances of the case.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The High Court's judgment is set aside and the appeal is allowed.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (4)
  • Malawi Railways Limited Vs. Nyasulu [1998] MWSC 3
  • John Fanuel Awiti Ogol Vs. Murithi [1985] eKLR
  • Sally Kibii & Another Vs. Francis Ogaro [2012] eKLR
  • Bikwatirizo V Railway Corporation [1971] E.A 82
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case