SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kagure v Mwangi & another (as Legal Representatives of Mwangi Waweru) (Civil Application E067 of 2021) [2022] KECA 797 (KLR) (10 June 2022) (Ruling)

[2022] KECA 797 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
797
Citation
[2022] KECA 797 (KLR)
Decided
10 June 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil ApplicationPostureAppeal from a judgment of the Environment and Land CourtCoramHANNAH OKWENGU, A. MBOGHOLI MSAGHA, DR. K. I. LAIBUTA
Holding

The court grants the applicant's application for a stay of execution pending the hearing and determination of her appeal.

Facts

The applicant, Esther Kagure, was issued an eviction order by Waithaka J in Nyeri ELC Case No. 211 of 2014. She appealed the decision and sought a stay of execution pending the hearing and determination of her appeal. The respondents, Henry Waweru Mwangi and Peter Maina Mwangi, as legal representatives of Mwangi Waweru, have commenced eviction proceedings against the applicant.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant's appeal is arguable
  2. Whether the appeal would be rendered nugatory if the stay of execution is not ordered

Reasoning

The court finds that the applicant has demonstrated that her appeal is arguable and that the appeal would be rendered nugatory if the stay of execution is not ordered. The court maintains the status quo until the appeal is finally heard and determined.

Outcome

In favor of the applicant

Orders

  • Grant a stay of execution pending the hearing and determination of the applicant's appeal

Remedies

  • Maintain the status quo until the appeal is finally heard and determined

Authorities cited

Cases cited (4)
  • Mugah v Kunga [1988] KLR
  • Stanley Kang'ethe v Tony Keter & 5 others [2013] eKLR
  • Bob Morgan Systems Ltd & another v Jones [2004] eKLR
  • Reliance Bank Limited v Norlake Investments Ltd [2002]1 EA 227
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case