Alwiy v Siani Limited & 2 others (Civil Appeal (Application) 27 of 2016) [2022] KECA 838 (KLR) (27 May 2022) (Ruling)
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- 838
- Citation
- [2022] KECA 838 (KLR)
- Decided
- 27 May 2022
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication for leave to admit additional evidenceCoramS. GATEMBU KAIRU, P. NYAMWEYA, J. LESIIT
Holding
The application is dismissed with costs to the respondents.
Facts
The appellant (Alwiy) agreed to sell structures known as 'Talking Trees' restaurant to the respondents (Siani Limited and others) in agreements dated 25th September 2006 and March 2007. The Environment and Land Court found that Alwiy agreed to sell the structures and was paid the agreed purchase price. The respondents were ordered to vacate the beach banda known as 'Talking Trees'.
Issues
- Whether the learned Judge misdirected himself in failing to acknowledge that the purported sale agreement contained numerous errors
- Whether the evidence sought to be admitted as additional evidence (forensic report and letter) could be obtained with reasonable diligence for use at the trial
Reasoning
The Court found no merit in the application, as the evidence sought to be admitted was not obtained with reasonable diligence and was not relevant to the matter before the court.
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Authorities cited
Cases cited (2)
- Mzee Wanjie and 93 others v A.K. Saikwa and others [1982-88] 1 KAR 462
- Hon. Mohamed Abdi Mahamud v Ahmed Abdullahi Mohamed and 3 others [2018] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…