SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Lopoyetum v Watia & 4 others (Civil Application E45 of 2021) [2022] KECA 899 (KLR) (13 May 2022) (Ruling)

[2022] KECA 899 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
899
Citation
[2022] KECA 899 (KLR)
Decided
13 May 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil ApplicationPostureAppeal from a judgment of the Court of AppealCoramS. GATEMBU KAIRU, P. NYAMWEYA, J. LESIIT
Holding

The judgment of the Environment and Land Court at Machakos is upheld. The transfer of the property to the applicant is declared unlawful, null and void. The title issued to the applicant is cancelled. The Chief Land Registrar is ordered to issue a title in respect of the property to the 3rd respondent.

Facts

The applicant claimed to have purchased a property from the 3rd respondent. The 1st and 2nd respondents initiated a suit against the applicant, and the Environment and Land Court at Machakos issued a restraining order against the National Land Commission from making compensation payments to the applicant.

Issues

  1. Whether the judgment of the Environment and Land Court at Machakos is upheld
  2. Whether the transfer of the property to the applicant is declared unlawful, null and void
  3. Whether the title issued to the applicant is cancelled
  4. Whether the Chief Land Registrar is ordered to issue a title in respect of the property to the 3rd respondent

Reasoning

The Court of Appeal upheld the restraining order and other orders of the Environment and Land Court at Machakos, finding that the transfer of the property to the applicant was unlawful.

Outcome

The applicant's application for leave to appeal is dismissed.

Orders

  • The restraining order issued by the Environment and Land Court at Machakos is upheld
  • The transfer of the property to the applicant is declared unlawful, null and void
  • The title issued to the applicant is cancelled
  • The Chief Land Registrar is ordered to issue a title in respect of the property to the 3rd respondent
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case