SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Technical University of Kenya v Owour (Civil Application E269 of 2020) [2023] KECA 103 (KLR) (3 February 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KECA 103 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
103
Citation
[2023] KECA 103 (KLR)
Decided
3 February 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil ApplicationPostureApplication for stay pending appealCoramF. SICHALE, HANNAH OKWENGU, P. O. KIAGE
Holding

The applicant has an arguable appeal and the stay of execution is granted.

Facts

John Omole Owuor was employed by the Teachers Service Commission and later seconded to Technical University of Kenya as a senior lecturer. He petitioned the Employment and Labour Relations Court after failing to be absorbed as a senior lecturer post-retirement.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant (Technical University of Kenya) discriminated against the respondent (John Omole Owuor) by failing to absorb him into its administration when he retired.
  2. Whether the applicant has an arguable appeal that would be rendered nugatory if the stay of execution is not granted.

Reasoning

The court found that the applicant failed to explain why it failed to reinstate the respondent despite doing the same for other lecturers, thus discriminating against him. The applicant has an arguable appeal with a high chance of success.

Outcome

Grant of stay of execution pending appeal

Orders

  • Injunction and stay of proceedings sought in the motion shall extend to the hearing and determination of the appeal.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Stanley Kangethe Kinyanjui vs. Tony Ketter & 5 others [2013] eKLR
  • Kieni Plains Co.ltd & 2 others vs. Ecobank Kenya Ltd[2018] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case