SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

United Democratic Movement & another v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 2 others (Election Petition Appeal E017 of 2023) [2023] KECA 1338 (KLR) (10 November 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KECA 1338 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
1338
Citation
[2023] KECA 1338 (KLR)
Decided
10 November 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeElection Petition AppealPostureAppeal from the High Court's ruling on an election petition involving a county assembly memberCoramD. K. MUSINGA, S. OLE KANTAI, L. ACHODE
Holding

This Court has no jurisdiction to hear or entertain a second appeal from an election petition involving the election of a member of a county assembly

Facts

UDM Party members applied for nominations to the Mandera County Assembly, but the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) published a list that included Abdow Bishar Maalim as a youth representative, despite Maalim not being a UDM Party member.

Issues

  1. Whether the Court has jurisdiction to hear an appeal from an election petition involving a county assembly member
  2. Whether the IEBC's error in publishing Maalim's name in the wrong category is sufficient to uphold the High Court's ruling

Reasoning

The Court held that the High Court's ruling was based on the incorrect party list, which was published by the IEBC. The Court acknowledged the UDM Party's right to a fair trial but emphasized that the error by the IEBC cannot be overlooked.

Outcome

The preliminary objection is upheld, and the notice of appeal is struck out with costs awarded to the respondent.

Orders

  • The notice of appeal is struck out
  • The UDM Party and the IEBC are ordered to pay costs of Kshs.200,000
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case