SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Susa v Republic (Criminal Appeal 193 of 2017) [2023] KECA 1413 (KLR) (24 November 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KECA 1413 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
1413
Citation
[2023] KECA 1413 (KLR)
Decided
24 November 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCriminal AppealPostureAppeal from a conviction and sentenceCoramJ. Njagi, M. Ngugi, J. Ngugi
Holding

We set aside the life sentence and substitute a term of twenty-five (25) years imprisonment to run from the date the appellant was first sentenced.

Facts

The appellant, Daniel Akweza Susa, was charged with delement contrary to section 8(1) of the Sexual Offences Act No. 3 of 2006 and an alternative charge of committing an indecent act with a child contrary to section 11(1) of the same Act. The appellant pleaded not guilty and was found guilty by the trial magistrate.

Issues

  1. The legality of the sentence imposed by the trial magistrate
  2. The constitutionality of mandatory minimum sentences in the Sexual Offences Act

Reasoning

The court found the sentence imposed by the trial magistrate to be excessive and unconstitutional due to mandatory minimum sentences in the Sexual Offences Act. The court considers both aggravating and mitigating factors and the lack of discretion in the lower courts.

Outcome

Appeal partly succeeds

Orders

  • Set aside the life sentence and substitute a term of twenty-five (25) years imprisonment

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Sexual Offences Act No. 3 of 2006
  • Criminal Procedure Code
Cases cited (3)
  • Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Anor vs. Republic [2017] eKLR
  • Maingi & 5 Others vs. Director of Public Prosecutions & Another (Petition E017 of 2021) [2022] KEHC 13118 (KLR)
  • Joshua Gichuki vs. Republic, Criminal Appeal No. 84 of 2015 (Unreported)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case