SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

ICEA Lion Assurance Co. Limited & another v Waigwa (Civil Application E394 of 2021) [2023] KECA 143 (KLR) (17 February 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KECA 143 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
143
Citation
[2023] KECA 143 (KLR)
Decided
17 February 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureApplication for stay of execution of judgment pending appealCoramW KARANJA, HANNAH OKWENGU, S OLE KANTAI
Holding

The applicants have satisfied the requirements of rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules and the motion is granted with an order of stay of execution subject to depositing Kshs 2,600,000 in a joint interest earning account.

Facts

The applicants were initially defendants in a suit for recovery of Kshs 2,600,000 for a stolen motor vehicle they provided insurance cover for. The High Court overturned the magistrate's court's judgment and entered judgment in favor of the respondent.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicants have an arguable appeal
  2. Whether the respondent's appeal would be rendered nugatory if the stay of execution is not granted
  3. Whether the respondent has the capacity to repay the decretal sum if the applicants succeed in their appeal

Reasoning

The applicants have raised five grounds of appeal, and the court finds them capable of being argued. The respondent's income is insufficient to repay the decretal sum, and the court grants the stay of execution.

Outcome

The motion is granted with an order of stay of execution subject to depositing Kshs 2,600,000 in a joint interest earning account.

Orders

  • Order of stay of execution subject to depositing Kshs 2,600,000 in a joint interest earning account

Remedies

  • Stay of execution pending appeal

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Court of Appeal Rules
Cases cited (1)
  • Stanley Kang'ethe Kinyanjui v Tony Keter & 5 others [2013] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case