SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mathii v Bedan (Civil Appeal (Application) 35 of 2019) [2023] KECA 1617 (KLR) (31 May 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KECA 1617 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
1617
Citation
[2023] KECA 1617 (KLR)
Decided
31 May 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil Appeal (Application)PostureApplication for extension of time to file and serve the Memorandum of Appeal and the Record of Appeal out of timeCoramAO MUCHELULE, J.G Kemei
Holding

The application is dismissed as there is no merit in it.

Facts

The applicant Francis Maina Mathii sued the respondent Peter Nguru Bedan in HCCC No. 36 of 1988 at Nyeri, seeking to recover land parcel No. Loc. 14/Gakurwe/82. The respondent had been in occupation of the land since 1968 and had developed it. The applicant sought the eviction of the respondent and the transfer of the land to him. The court dismissed the application and found that the applicant was seeking to execute a judgment that was more than 12 years old, which he could not do due to the provisions of sections 4(4) and 7 of the Limitation Actions Act. The applicant filed a notice of appeal, but the court dismissed it with costs. The applicant then sought an extension of time to file and serve the Memorandum of Appeal and the Record of Appeal out of time.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant's application for extension of time to file and serve the Memorandum of Appeal and the Record of Appeal out of time should be granted.
  2. Whether the applicant's delay in filing the application was justified and inordinate.

Reasoning

The court exercised its unfettered discretion to deny the extension of time, considering the applicant's protracted nature of the dispute and his unrepresentative status. The court found no merit in the application and dismissed it.

Outcome

The application is dismissed.

Orders

  • The application for extension of time to file and serve the Memorandum of Appeal and the Record of Appeal out of time is dismissed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Limitation Actions Act
  • Court of Appeal Rules, 2022
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case