SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Erick Kimingichi Wapang’ana t/a Magharibi Machineries Limited v Equity Bank Limited & another (Civil Appeal 107 of 2016) [2023] KECA 305 (KLR) (17 March 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KECA 305 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
305
Citation
[2023] KECA 305 (KLR)
Decided
17 March 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a ruling and order of the Environment and Land Court of KenyaCoramKiage, JA, Muchelule, J, Mukunya, J, Mumbi Ngugi, J
Holding

The appeal was dismissed as the learned judge did not err in dismissing the suit, the hearing and ruling were not unfair, the appellant did tender evidence of repayment, the learned judge had the power to set aside the dismissal and direct the appellant to appeal, and the learned judge did not err by holding that he had no power to extend the injunctive orders.

Facts

The appellant, Erick Kimingichi Wapang’ana, was advanced an overdraft facility of Kshs 7,800,000 by Equity Bank Limited. The appellant defaulted in repayment, leading to the bank seeking to auction the suit properties. The appellant filed a suit to stop the auction and sought an injunction. The injunction was granted, but later the respondents sought its discharge, variation, or setting aside.

Issues

  1. Whether the court erred by dismissing the suit without affording the appellant a chance to be heard
  2. Whether the hearing and ruling were unfair and unjustified
  3. Whether the appellant did not tender evidence of repayment of the loan
  4. Whether the learned judge had the power to set aside the dismissal and direct the appellant to appeal
  5. Whether the learned judge erred by holding that he had no power to set aside the dismissal and direct the appellant to appeal
  6. Whether the learned judge erred by holding that he had no power to extend the injunctive orders

Reasoning

The court held that the appellant did not have a valid reason to appeal the dismissal of the suit, as the last action in the matter was a ruling delivered on December 16, 2014, and the one-year period had not lapsed. The court also held that the learned judge had the power to extend the injunctive orders.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
  • Order 17 Rule 2
  • Order 40 Rule 6
Cases cited (3)
  • Ali Bin Khamis v Salim Bin Khamis Kirobe & Others (1956) 1 EA 195
  • Onyango Oloo v Attorney General (1986-1989) EA 456
  • Attorney General & 6 Others v Mohamed Balala & 11 Others [2014] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case