SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Longhorn Publishers Kenya also known as Longhorn Kenya Limited v Njuguna (Civil Appeal E413 of 2020) [2023] KECA 316 (KLR) (17 March 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KECA 316 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
316
Citation
[2023] KECA 316 (KLR)
Decided
17 March 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a judgment of the Employment and Labour Relations CourtCoramF. Sichahe, L. Achode, M. Gachaka
Holding

The court found that the termination was procedurally and substantively fair, and that the respondent was entitled to compensation for unfair termination.

Facts

The respondent, Karen Karagania Njuguna, was terminated from her position as a Personnel and Administration Manager on April 3, 2013, by her former employer, Longhorn Publishers Kenya. She alleged that her position was unlawfully declared redundant and that the appellant renamed her position as Chief Human Resource Officer and recruited a replacement with a similar job description.

Issues

  1. Whether the termination of the respondent's position was procedurally and substantively fair
  2. Whether the termination was justified due to financial decline
  3. Whether the respondent was entitled to compensation for unfair termination

Reasoning

The court held that the termination was procedurally and substantively fair, and that the respondent was entitled to compensation for unfair termination. The court noted that the appellant followed the provisions of Section 40 of the Employment Act and that the respondent's position was merged with the finance office leading to the abolition of her position.

Outcome

The appeal is allowed, and the judgment of the Employment and Labour Relations Court is set aside.

Orders

  • Compensation of four million four hundred and one thousand five hundred and ninety-five shillings (Kshs. 4,401,595/=) less statutory deductions is awarded to the respondent

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case