SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Shah v Azim Sameja t/a Business 2000 & another (Civil Application E426 of 2022) [2023] KECA 368 (KLR) (31 March 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KECA 368 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
368
Citation
[2023] KECA 368 (KLR)
Decided
31 March 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication for stay of sale and auction and stay of execution pending appealCoramD. K. MUSINGA, J. MATIVO, W. KORIR
Holding

The application for stay of sale and/or auction of the property pending the hearing and determination of the applicant's intended appeal has merit.

Facts

The applicant filed objection proceedings in Nairobi High Court Civil Case No 689 of 2001 seeking to revoke attachment orders issued in respect of the suit property. The attachment orders had been issued in execution of the judgment in that matter. The applicant's application was dismissed, and the 1st respondent was allowed to dispose of the suit property.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant's intended appeal is arguable with high prospects of success
  2. Whether the 1st respondent will be prejudiced by orders of stay of execution

Reasoning

The applicant is correct that the stay order is not meant to reverse the existing attachment of the suit property. The 1st respondent will not lose sight of the property as it is already attached, and no prejudice can occur.

Outcome

The application is granted.

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicant to appeal against the ruling of the superior court
  • There is a stay of sale and/or auction of the property pending the hearing and determination of the applicant's intended appeal
  • The costs of this application abide the outcome of the appeal

Remedies

  • Stay of sale and/or auction of the property
  • Leave to appeal granted
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case