SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Marriot Africa International Ltd v Marigu & 4 others (Civil Application E152 of 2022) [2023] KECA 396 (KLR) (31 March 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KECA 396 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
396
Citation
[2023] KECA 396 (KLR)
Decided
31 March 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication for stay of further proceedings pending appealCoramK M'INOTI, DR K I LAIBUTA, M GACHOKA, CIArb, FCIArb
Holding

The application for stay of further proceedings pending appeal is dismissed with costs to the 1st, 3rd and 4th respondents.

Facts

Marriot Africa International Ltd purchased a property in Ruiru, Kiambu County, and subdivided it into plots. The respondents, claiming to be beneficiaries of the estate of James Kanyotu, interfered with the applicant's possession and enjoyment of the property. The applicant filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction, which was subsequently transferred to Nairobi. The respondents applied to set aside a consent order, leading to an appeal.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant's intended appeal is arguable
  2. Whether the proceedings should be stayed pending the appeal

Reasoning

The court finds that the applicant has not satisfied the second limb of the test under rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules. The court also notes that the consent order did not affect the respondents who were not parties to it.

Outcome

Application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for stay of further proceedings pending appeal is dismissed

Authorities cited

Cases cited (3)
  • Cooperative Bank of Kenya Ltd v Banking Insurance and Finance Union, Kenya [2014] eKLR
  • Stanley Kangethe Kinyanjui v Tony Ketter & 5 Others [2013] eKLR
  • Halsbury’s Law of England, 4th Edition. Vol 37 page 330
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case