Marriot Africa International Ltd v Marigu & 4 others (Civil Application E152 of 2022) [2023] KECA 396 (KLR) (31 March 2023) (Ruling)
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- 396
- Citation
- [2023] KECA 396 (KLR)
- Decided
- 31 March 2023
The application for stay of further proceedings pending appeal is dismissed with costs to the 1st, 3rd and 4th respondents.
Facts
Marriot Africa International Ltd purchased a property in Ruiru, Kiambu County, and subdivided it into plots. The respondents, claiming to be beneficiaries of the estate of James Kanyotu, interfered with the applicant's possession and enjoyment of the property. The applicant filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction, which was subsequently transferred to Nairobi. The respondents applied to set aside a consent order, leading to an appeal.
Issues
- Whether the applicant's intended appeal is arguable
- Whether the proceedings should be stayed pending the appeal
Reasoning
The court finds that the applicant has not satisfied the second limb of the test under rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules. The court also notes that the consent order did not affect the respondents who were not parties to it.
Outcome
Application dismissed
Orders
- The application for stay of further proceedings pending appeal is dismissed
Authorities cited
Cases cited (3)
- Cooperative Bank of Kenya Ltd v Banking Insurance and Finance Union, Kenya [2014] eKLR
- Stanley Kangethe Kinyanjui v Tony Ketter & 5 Others [2013] eKLR
- Halsbury’s Law of England, 4th Edition. Vol 37 page 330
Loading judgment…