SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Njoroge v Gitau & 3 others (Civil Appeal 407 of 2018) [2023] KECA 417 (KLR) (14 April 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KECA 417 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
417
Citation
[2023] KECA 417 (KLR)
Decided
14 April 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the Judgment and decree of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (William Musyoka, J.) dated 5th May, 2017 in Succession Cause No. 2270 of 2001CoramDK MUSINGA, KI LAIBUTA, PM GACHOKA, William Musyoka
Holding

The court has jurisdiction to determine the issue of trust and give appropriate directions.

Facts

The deceased, Njoroge Gitau, had no son but five daughters. The parties dispute the distribution of his estate, particularly the ownership of land. The 1st respondent claims to be a nephew, while the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th respondents claim to be daughters. The 3rd respondent testified that the deceased held the property in trust for the 1st respondent's father.

Issues

  1. Whether the land is family land and therefore subject to trust or owned absolutely by the deceased.
  2. Jurisdiction of the Family Court to deal with a claim of trust in succession proceedings.

Reasoning

The court held that the Family Court has jurisdiction to determine the issue of trust in succession proceedings, as it is within the High Court's jurisdiction under Article 165(3)(a) of the Constitution and Section 47 of the Law of Succession Act.

Outcome

Affirmed

Orders

  • The court found that the deceased held the property in trust for the 1st respondent's father.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Law of Succession Act, Cap 160
Cases cited (1)
  • Zipporah Wanjiru Mwangi vs Zipporah Wanjiru Njoroge (2017) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case