SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ministry of Interior & Co-ordination of National Government & 2 others v Obara & another (Civil Application E378 of 2021) [2023] KECA 455 (KLR) (20 April 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KECA 455 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
455
Citation
[2023] KECA 455 (KLR)
Decided
20 April 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication for stay of execution pending appeal from the Employment & Labour Relations Court judgmentCoramD. K. MUSINGA, DR. K. I. LAIBUTA, ALI-ARONI
Holding

The court allowed the respondents' notice of motion to strike out the applicants' notice of appeal dated August 6, 2020, and deemed it as having been withdrawn pursuant to rule 85(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022. Consequently, the applicants' notice of motion dated October 17, 2021 is incompetent and is hereby struck out with costs to the respondents.

Facts

Employment and Labour Relations Court (Maureen Onyango, J) delivered judgment dismissing the respondents' claim for reinstatement but awarding them compensation for summary dismissal, salary withheld during interdiction, and pay in lieu of notice; pension; costs; and interest.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicants' notice of appeal was valid and timely
  2. Whether the respondents' notice of motion to strike out the applicants' notice of appeal was valid and timely

Reasoning

The court found that the applicants' notice of appeal was not filed within the prescribed period and that the respondents' notice of motion was filed to delay the respondents' judgment.

Outcome

The applicants' notice of appeal dated August 6, 2020, is deemed as having been withdrawn.

Orders

  • The applicants' notice of appeal dated August 6, 2020, is deemed as having been withdrawn.
  • The applicants' notice of motion dated October 17, 2021 is incompetent and is hereby struck out with costs to the respondents.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case