SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Waweru & another v Kinuthia (Civil Application E017 of 2022) [2023] KECA 476 (KLR) (12 May 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KECA 476 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
476
Citation
[2023] KECA 476 (KLR)
Decided
12 May 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil ApplicationPostureAppeal from the Judgment of the Environment and Land Court of Kenya at NakuruCoramS. Munyao, F. Ochieng, L. Achode, W. Korir
Holding

The court found that the respondent did not comply with the requirements for an appeal and granted the application to withdraw the notice of appeal and award costs to the respondent.

Facts

The applicants, Michael Waweru and Phillisia Nyambura, filed an application seeking orders that the notice of appeal dated 6th November, 2017 and filed on 8th November, 2017 be deemed to have been withdrawn, and an order that the costs of and incidental to this application be awarded to the respondent.

Issues

  1. Whether the notice of appeal was properly filed and served.
  2. Whether the respondent has complied with the requirements for an appeal.
  3. Whether the court should grant the application to withdraw the notice of appeal and award costs to the respondent.

Reasoning

The court ruled that the respondent failed to file the record of appeal within the appointed time and did not apply for copies of proceedings or a certified copy of the judgment.

Outcome

The notice of appeal was deemed to have been withdrawn, and the costs of and incidental to the application were awarded to the respondent.

Orders

  • The notice of appeal dated 6th November, 2017 and filed on 8th November, 2017 be deemed to have been withdrawn.
  • The costs of and incidental to this application be awarded to the respondent.

Remedies

  • Award of costs to the respondent.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case