SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kiptum v Birir & another (Civil Appeal 66 of 2020) [2023] KECA 482 (KLR) (12 May 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KECA 482 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
482
Citation
[2023] KECA 482 (KLR)
Decided
12 May 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a judgment of the Environment and Land CourtCoramP. NYAMWEYA, J. LESIIT, G. V. ODUNGA
Holding

The Appellant’s claim was not properly before the court and her claim based on trust was not merited. The suit by the Respondents against the Appellant is dismissed with costs to the Appellant.

Facts

The Appellant and Respondents were the registered proprietors of land parcel known as Kili/Mtwapa/3834. The Respondents sought an order for vacant possession and a declaration that the Appellant has no legal or possessory right in the suit property.

Issues

  1. Whether the Appellant’s claim was properly before the court
  2. Whether the trial court adequately addressed the Respondents’ offer to allocate 1/8th of the property to the Appellant
  3. Whether the trial court adequately explained the evaluation of the developments carried out by the Appellant

Reasoning

The court found that the Appellant’s claim was not properly before the court and her claim based on trust was not merited. The trial court’s failure to address the Respondents’ offer to allocate 1/8th of the property to the Appellant and its failure to explain the evaluation of the developments carried out by the Appellant were errors.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Suit by the Respondents against the Appellant is dismissed with costs to the Appellant
  • Appellant is entitled to ownership and possession of all parcels of land that were excised from Kili/Mtwapa/3834
  • Respondents to transfer the said properties to the Appellant
  • Permanent injunction restraining the Respondents from interfering with the Appellant's quiet enjoyment and occupation of the said properties
  • Remitted the matter back to the trial court to determine the value of Kili/Mtwapa/5488 free from any developments

Remedies

  • Costs to the Appellant
  • Declaration that the Appellant is entitled to ownership and possession of the excised parcels of land

Authorities cited

Cases cited (4)
  • Selle v Associated Motor Boat Co.
  • Shah vs. Aguto
  • Ramjibhai vs. Rattan Singh S/O Nagina Singh
  • Mohammed Mahmoud Jabane vs Highstone Butty Tongoi Olenja
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case