SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Bethsaida Resort & Spa Limited v Gauderlot (Civil Appeal 60 of 2020) [2023] KECA 628 (KLR) (26 May 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KECA 628 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
628
Citation
[2023] KECA 628 (KLR)
Decided
26 May 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the ruling and order of the Environment and Land CourtCoramS. GATEMBU KAIRU, P.NYAMWEYA, G.V. ODUNGA
Holding

The appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondent.

Facts

The appellant filed a suit against the respondent in the Magistrate's Court at Kwale, seeking a declaration that a sale agreement entered into between them dated August 2, 2017, over land title numbers Kwale/Diani Complex/246 and Kwale/Diani Complex/248 is void and unenforceable. The respondent opposed the suit, claiming that the value of the subject matter was Kshs 45,000,000, while the appellant claimed it was Kshs 4,500,000. The suit was dismissed, and the respondent obtained a certificate of stated costs.

Issues

  1. Whether the learned judge misapprehended the value of the subject matter of the suit in determining the instruction fees awardable to the respondent.
  2. Whether the learned judge erred in taking the contract price of the suit property as the value of the subject matter.

Reasoning

The Court held that the value of the subject matter was Kshs 45,000,000, as stated in the pleadings, and that the learned judge did not err in determining the instruction fees based on this value.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Costs to the respondent

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Joreth Ltd vs. Kigano & Associates [2002] 1 EA 92
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case