SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kiurire v Kimani (Civil Application E001 of 2022) [2023] KECA 638 (KLR) (3 February 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KECA 638 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
638
Citation
[2023] KECA 638 (KLR)
Decided
3 February 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil ApplicationPostureApplication for extension of time to file and serve Record of AppealCoramJ.G Kemei, J.G.Kemei, Mohammed
Holding

The application for extension of time to file and serve the Record of Appeal is granted, and the costs of the application are provided for.

Facts

The impugned judgment was delivered on September 14, 2021. The applicant filed a notice of appeal on September 30, 2021, and a letter requesting certified copies of proceedings on October 11, 2021. The certified copies were ready on December 8, 2021, and a certificate of delay was issued on December 23, 2021, indicating a 44-day delay.

Issues

  1. Whether to grant leave to appeal out of time
  2. Whether to grant a stay of execution pending appeal

Reasoning

The court exercised its discretion to grant the application, considering the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, and the possibility of the appeal succeeding.

Outcome

The application for extension of time to file and serve the Record of Appeal is granted.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal out of time granted
  • Stay of execution of the impugned judgment granted

Remedies

  • Costs of the application provided for

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Court of Appeal Rules
  • Rules of the Environment & Land Court of Kenya
Cases cited (1)
  • Fakir Mohamed v. Joseph Mugambi & 2 others C.A. NO. NAI. 332 of 2004
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case