SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Maganjo v Gatimu & 6 others (Civil Application 116 of 2020) [2023] KECA 696 (KLR) (24 March 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KECA 696 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
696
Citation
[2023] KECA 696 (KLR)
Decided
24 March 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil ApplicationPostureApplication for extension of time to file record of appealCoramJAMILA MOHAMMED
Holding

The motion is allowed, and the applicant shall file and serve the memorandum of appeal and the record of appeal within 45 days from the date of this ruling.

Facts

The applicant, Joseph Karimi Maganjo, sought to file and serve the record of appeal out of time due to delays in obtaining certified copies of the proceedings.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant's motion for extension of time to file the record of appeal is merited
  2. Whether the intended appeal has a reasonable chance of success

Reasoning

The court found the delay not inordinate and well explained, and the intended appeal has an arguable chance of success.

Outcome

The motion is allowed.

Orders

  • The applicant shall file and serve the memorandum of appeal and the record of appeal within 45 days from the date of this ruling.
  • The costs of this motion shall abide the outcome of the intended appeal.

Remedies

  • Extension of time to file the record of appeal
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case