SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Compact Freight Systems Limited v Aswa Developers & Contractors Limited (Civil Appeal E003 of 2021) [2023] KECA 704 (KLR) (9 June 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KECA 704 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
704
Citation
[2023] KECA 704 (KLR)
Decided
9 June 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureFirst appeal by the Appellant against the judgment of the High CourtCoramP. NYAMWEYA, J. LESIIT, G.V. ODUNGA
Holding

The appeal is allowed, the judgment of the High Court is set aside, and the case is remitted back to the High Court for hearing afresh.

Facts

Compact Freight Systems Limited sued Aswa Developers & Contractors Limited for outstanding balance of Kshs 7,234,623.30 for work done and materials supplied. The Respondent claimed breach of oral agreement and sought judgment for the sum claimed.

Issues

  1. Whether the Respondent was entitled to the sum claimed on the basis of the valuation certificate issued by the project manager.
  2. Whether the learned Judge misdirected himself in law.

Reasoning

The learned Judge failed to determine issues raised by the parties in their pleadings, evidence, and submissions.

Outcome

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Judgment of PJ Otieno, J set aside
  • Remitted back to the High Court at Mombasa for hearing afresh
  • Each party to bear its own costs of this appeal
  • Case management for setting the case down for hearing

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Selle and another v Associated Motor Boat Co. Ltd [1968] EA 123
  • United India Insurance Co. Ltd, Kenindia Insurance Co Ltd & Oriental Fire & General Insurance Co Ltd v East African Underwriters (Kenya) Ltd [1985] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case