SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Gecaga v Quinvest Limited (Civil Appeal (Application) E729 of 2021) [2023] KECA 78 (KLR) (3 February 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KECA 78 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
78
Citation
[2023] KECA 78 (KLR)
Decided
3 February 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil Appeal (Application)PostureApplication for leave to cease acting for the appellant in Civil Appeal No. E729 OF 2021CoramKI LAIBUTA
Holding

The court orders that counsel for the appellant be deemed as having ceased to act for the appellant on service upon the appellant of this order

Facts

The appellant, Margaret Gacigi Gecaga, sought leave to cease acting for her in Civil Appeal No. E729 OF 2021 due to a breakdown in the advocate/client relationship.

Issues

  1. Whether counsel for the appellant, M/s J M Njenga and Company, can cease acting for the appellant
  2. Whether the advocate/client relationship has broken down irretrievably

Reasoning

The court adheres to Rule 23(2) of the Court of Appeal Rules, which requires an advocate to apply for leave to cease acting for a party in a civil appeal or application before a single judge.

Outcome

The application is granted, and the appellant is deemed to have ceased to act for the appellant.

Orders

  • Counsel for the appellant be deemed as having ceased to act for the appellant on service upon the appellant of this order
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case