SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Municipal Council of Kisumu v Mayfair Holdings Limited (Civil Appeal 124 of 2018) [2023] KECA 844 (KLR) (7 July 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KECA 844 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
844
Citation
[2023] KECA 844 (KLR)
Decided
7 July 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the judgment of the Environment and Land Court in KisumuCoramAs Tuiyott, Kiage, Kibunja, Madan, Mumbi Ngugi, Tuiyott
Holding

The court upheld the respondent's claims and ordered the appellant to remove or demolish structures obstructing the respondent's access road.

Facts

The respondent claimed that the appellant, which had the legal mandate to control developments in the area, had breached its duty by constructing or authorizing the construction of a structure on Kibiki Road that blocked access to the respondent's property and served as a service lane.

Issues

  1. Whether the appellant should be restrained from interfering with the respondent's quiet possession and enjoyment
  2. Whether the appellant should be compelled to remove or demolish structures obstructing the respondent's access road

Reasoning

The court found that the appellant had breached its duty to the respondent by constructing a structure on Kibiki Road that blocked access to the respondent's property and served as a service lane.

Outcome

Appeal upheld

Orders

  • An order of permanent injunction
  • An order of mandatory injunction
  • An order to remove or demolish structures obstructing the access road

Remedies

  • Removal or demolition of structures obstructing the access road
  • Engagement of County Land Registrar and Surveyor to determine the ground boundaries and structures obstructing the access road
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case