SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Soni & another v Shah & another (Civil Application E222 of 2023) [2024] KECA 115 (KLR) (9 February 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KECA 115 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
115
Citation
[2024] KECA 115 (KLR)
Decided
9 February 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureAppeal from a dismissal of an application to set aside an interlocutory judgment and final decreeCoramS. GATEMBU KAIRU, F. TUIYOTT, J. LESIIT
Holding

We grant a temporary order of injunction to restrain the respondents from selling the property known as LR No. 34/524 located at Wambugu Road, Parklands Nairobi pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.

Facts

The applicants, mother and son, took a loan from the respondents. The respondents filed suit and obtained an interlocutory judgment and a decree. The applicants applied to set aside the judgment and stay execution, claiming service of summons was irregular and they were coerced into signing documents.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicants' application to set aside the interlocutory judgment and final decree was arguable
  2. Whether the applicants' appeal is frivolous
  3. Whether the applicants are entitled to a temporary injunction pending the appeal

Reasoning

The applicants are not entitled to a temporary injunction as the appeal is not frivolous and the applicants' claims of duress are unfounded. However, we grant the temporary injunction to prevent the sale of the property pending the appeal.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed, temporary injunction granted

Orders

  • Temporary injunction to restrain the respondents from selling the property LR No. 34/524 located at Wambugu Road, Parklands Nairobi pending the hearing and determination of the appeal

Remedies

  • Temporary injunction

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • John Mburu vs Consolidated Bank of Kenya [2018] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case