SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kanyari v Republic (Criminal Application E110 of 2024) [2024] KECA 1644 (KLR) (15 November 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KECA 1644 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
1644
Citation
[2024] KECA 1644 (KLR)
Decided
15 November 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCriminal AppealPostureApplication for leave to appeal out of timeCoramPM GACHOKA
Holding

The application for leave to appeal out of time is allowed. The applicant shall file his notice of appeal within 14 days from the date of this order. Thereafter, the record of appeal shall be filed and served within 30 days from the date hereof.

Facts

The applicant was charged with delement contrary to section 8(1) as read with section 8(2) of the Sexual Offences Act in Engineer CM (SO) Case No. 793 of 2017. He was found guilty and sentenced to life imprisonment.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant was supplied with the judgment of the High Court in good time to enable him to file the appeal.
  2. Whether the discretionary powers to extend time should be exercised by the Court of Appeal.

Reasoning

The Court considered the reasons advanced by the applicant, the supporting affidavit, and the respondent's concession to the application. The Court found that the applicant met the threshold for the exercise of discretion and allowed the application.

Outcome

The application for leave to appeal out of time is allowed.

Orders

  • The applicant shall file his notice of appeal within 14 days from the date of this order.
  • The record of appeal shall be filed and served within 30 days from the date hereof.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Sexual Offences Act
  • Court of Appeal Rules 2022
Cases cited (2)
  • Mungatu v Republic [2023] KECA 671 (KLR)
  • Muringa Company Limited v Archdiocese of Nairobi Registered Trustees [2020] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case