SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

M’rintari v M’rintari (Civil Appeal (Application) 74 of 2018) [2025] KECA 2230 (KLR) (19 December 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KECA 2230 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
2230
Citation
[2025] KECA 2230 (KLR)
Decided
19 December 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil Appeal (Application)PostureApplication for substitution and reinstatement of the appealCoramALI-ARONI
Holding

The application is allowed, and the applicant and his sister are substituted in place of the deceased. The appeal is also revived.

Facts

The deceased appellant, M'Muguna M'rintari, died on 25th June 2023. His children, including the applicant, were unaware of the ongoing appeal until after his death. Family issues arose, and it took time to resolve these before the applicant and his sister could seek to be substituted and the appeal revived.

Issues

  1. Whether to allow substitution and revival of the appeal
  2. Whether the applicant provided sufficient reasons for the delay

Reasoning

The court finds that the applicant provided a reasonable explanation for the delay due to family issues and the need to obtain a grant of letters of administration. The court considers the delay acceptable given the circumstances.

Outcome

The application is granted.

Orders

  • The applicant and his sister are substituted in place of the deceased
  • The appeal is revived
  • The appeal is listed for hearing in the next term

Remedies

  • Substitution of the applicant and his sister in place of the deceased
  • Revival of the appeal

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Rules 2022
  • Court of Appeal Rules 2022
Cases cited (2)
  • Njoroge & Another vs. Kamau (Deceased) (Civil Appeal (Application) E051 of 2019) [2024] KECA 806 (KLR)
  • Ngari vs. Murithi (Deceased) Substituted by Wanjira Ngari & Another (Civil Appeal (Application) 140 of 2018) [2025] KECA 358
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case