SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Bureau of Standards v Kwale International Sugar Company Limited & 4 others (Civil Appeal (Application) E002 of 2020) [2025] KECA 867 (KLR) (23 May 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KECA 867 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
867
Citation
[2025] KECA 867 (KLR)
Decided
23 May 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil Appeal (Application)PostureReference against the Ruling on TaxationCoramDR. K. I. LAIBUTA CArb, FCIArb.
Holding

The applicant's Reference fails and is hereby dismissed with no orders as to costs.

Facts

The Kenya Bureau of Standards appealed a decision in Mombasa Civil Appeal No. 2 of 2020, which allowed the applicant's appeal with costs. The applicant challenged the award of Kshs. 500,000 on account of instructions fees, arguing it was manifestly inadequate.

Issues

  1. The adequacy of the award of Kshs. 500,000 on account of instructions fees
  2. The discretion of the Taxing Officer in assessing instructions fees

Reasoning

The Court of Appeal held that the Taxing Officer's discretionary decision in assessing instructions fees at Kshs. 500,000 was not erroneous and that the amount awarded was not too low to amount to an injustice.

Outcome

The applicant's Reference is dismissed with no orders as to costs.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (4)
  • Republic v Minister for Agriculture & 2 others Ex-parte Samuel Muchiri W’Njuguna & 6 others [2006] eKLR
  • Thomas James Arthur v Nyeri Electricity Undertaking [1961] EA 492
  • Premchand Raichand Ltd & another v Quarry Services of East Africa Ltd & others [1972] EA 162
  • Joreth Limited v Kigano & Associates [2002] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case