SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Bukanja v Republic (Criminal Appeal 130 of 2018) [2026] KECA 143 (KLR) (30 January 2026) (Judgment)

[2026] KECA 143 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
143
Citation
[2026] KECA 143 (KLR)
Decided
30 January 2026
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCriminal AppealPostureAppeal from the High Court's conviction and sentenceCoramD. K. MUSINGA, P. O. KIAGE, G. V. ODUNGA
Holding

The appeal is dismissed as the sentence was lawful and the Court of Appeal has no jurisdiction to interfere with the decision of the High Court on facts.

Facts

The appellant, Godfrey Wanyonyi Bukanya, was charged with and convicted of delement of a girl (inserting his penis into a 13-year-old girl's vagina) in Bungoma County. The prosecution alleged that the appellant took the girl from her brother and led her to a bush, where he delemented her. The appellant denied the charge.

Issues

  1. Whether the sentence imposed by the trial court was excessive and harsh
  2. Whether the appellant's appeal against the sentence only is valid

Reasoning

The Supreme Court has established that the Court of Appeal's jurisdiction on second appeals is limited to matters of law and cannot interfere with the decision of the High Court on facts unless it was shown that the trial court and the first appellate court considered matters they ought not to have considered, failed to consider matters they should have considered, or were plainly wrong in their decision when considering the evidence as a whole. The sentence meted against the appellant was lawful and the Court of Appeal has no power to interfere with it.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Sexual Offences Act
  • Criminal Procedure Code
Cases cited (1)
  • Robert Mutungi Muumbi v Republic
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case