SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mbaka v Republic (Criminal Appeal 5A of 2020) [2026] KECA 299 (KLR) (13 February 2026) (Judgment)

[2026] KECA 299 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
299
Citation
[2026] KECA 299 (KLR)
Decided
13 February 2026
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCriminal AppealPostureSecond AppealCoramASIKE-MAKHANDIA, H. A. OMONDI, L. KIMARU
Holding

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding that the appellant has not established any grounds upon which the Court can interfere with his sentence.

Facts

The appellant Dominic Mogere Mbaka was tried for delement contrary to Section 8(1) of the Sexual Offences Act, causing his penis to penetrate the vagina of a 6-year-old girl, J.A.O1.

Issues

  1. Severity of the sentence imposed
  2. Mandate of the Court of Appeal on second appeals

Reasoning

The Court of Appeal held that the severity of the sentence is a matter of fact and not a legal issue open for consideration on second appeal. The Court also stated that the Court of Appeal's jurisdiction is limited to matters of law and cannot interfere with the decision of the High Court on facts unless it is shown that the trial court and the first appellate court considered matters they ought not to have considered.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Sexual Offences Act
Cases cited (4)
  • Republic vs. Mwangi; Initiative for Strategic Litigation in Africa (ISLA) & 3 Others (Petition E018 of 2023) (2024) KESC34 (KLR) (12th July, 2024)
  • Samuel Warui Karimi vs. Republic (2016) eKLR
  • Chemangong vs. R (1984) KLR 611
  • Kagere vs. Republic (Criminal Appeal E031 of 2023) (2024) KECA 1187 (KLR) (20 September 2024)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case