SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Joseph Muriuki Mwaniki v Fortune Sacco Society Limited [2021] KECPT 552 (KLR)

[2021] KECPT 552 (KLR) Co-operative Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Co-operative Tribunal
Case number
552
Citation
[2021] KECPT 552 (KLR)
Decided
6 May 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCredit DisputePostureAppeal from a decision of the Co-operative TribunalCoramHon. B. Kimemia Chairperson, Hon. J. Mwatsama Deputy Chairperson, Mr. P. Gichuki Member
Holding

The Court finds the Claimant did not owe the Respondent any money and that the sale of his goods in 2011 was sufficient to settle the debt. The Respondent is ordered to have the Claimant's credit listing cleared in the CRB and to provide an accurate account of the proceeds of sale impounded on 18.11.2011.

Facts

Claimant Joseph Muriuki Mwaniki sued the Respondent Fortune Sacco Society Limited for clearing his name from the Credit Reference Bureau (CRB) and for the proceeds of sale of his impounded property. The Claimant alleged he had paid off his loan and was wrongly listed as a defaulting member of the Sacco.

Issues

  1. Did the Claimant owe the Respondent any money?
  2. Is the Claimant owed any cash by the Respondent?
  3. Was it wrong for the Respondent to list the Claimant with CRB?

Reasoning

The Court found the Claimant had paid off his loan and the sale of his goods in 2011 was sufficient to settle the debt. The Respondent's listing of the Claimant as a defaulting member was negligent and in bad taste.

Outcome

In favour of the Claimant

Orders

  • An order to the Respondent to have the Claimant's credit listing cleared in the CRB
  • Accurate Account of proceeds of sale impounded on 18.11.2011 is not viable
  • Costs to the Claimant and interest at court rates
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case