SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Orient Sacco Society Ltd v Wanjeru (Tribunal Case 30 of 2021) [2023] KECPT 838 (KLR) (31 August 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KECPT 838 (KLR) Co-operative Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Co-operative Tribunal
Case number
838
Citation
[2023] KECPT 838 (KLR)
Decided
31 August 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTribunal CasePostureClaimant v RespondentCoramBM KIMEMIA, B SAWE, F LOTUIYA, P. GICHUKI, M CHESIKAW, PO AOL
Holding

The court finds that the loan balance of Kshs. 1,400,000/= is not in contention. The court declares that the loan repayment should resume as at the date of the unlawful termination of employment by Orient Sacco Society Ltd.

Facts

Orient Sacco Society Ltd advanced two loans to Jane Wangari Wanjeru: a personal loan of Kshs. 460,350/= and a sta loan of Kshs. 1,400,000/=. The loans were due for repayment, but Wanjeru denied owing the loans and claimed she was unlawfully terminated.

Issues

  1. Whether Wanjeru owes the claimed loan amount
  2. Whether the termination of employment by Orient Sacco Society Ltd was unlawful
  3. Whether the loan repayment should resume as at the date of the unlawful termination

Reasoning

The court confirms the loan agreement for Kshs. 1,400,000/= with a 5% interest rate and denies that the security was Wanjeru's salary. The court finds that the termination of employment was unlawful and that the loan repayment should resume.

Outcome

The court declares that the loan repayment should resume as at the date of the unlawful termination of employment by Orient Sacco Society Ltd.

Orders

  • Declaration that the loan repayment should resume as at the date of the unlawful termination of employment by Orient Sacco Society Ltd.
  • Reinstatement of the terms of the loan agreement between the Claimant and the Respondent.
  • Reinstatement of the Respondent to her position within the Claimant institution.

Remedies

  • Cost and interests of the suit.
  • Any other reliefs that this Honourable court deems fit to grant.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case