SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Diocese of Eldoret Trustees (Registered) v National Land Commission & 2 others [2016] KEELC 982 (KLR)

[2016] KEELC 982 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
982
Citation
[2016] KEELC 982 (KLR)
Decided
1 April 2016
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAdministrative LawPosturePetition for Declaration
Holding

The court found that the petitioner was not afforded a fair hearing and that the National Land Commission acted unilaterally.

Facts

The Diocese of Eldoret Trustees filed a petition against the National Land Commission and Trustees of Kiplombe Kaptich School alleging that the National Land Commission revoked their title to a parcel of land without a fair hearing.

Issues

  1. Whether the petitioner was afforded a fair hearing
  2. Whether the land in contention is public or private land
  3. Whether the petitioner should have filed judicial review
  4. Whether sections 3,6,14 of the National Land Commission Act can be applied in retrospect

Reasoning

The court held that the petitioner was not given a fair hearing as required by Article 47 of the Constitution, and that the National Land Commission's actions were illegal and unconstitutional.

Outcome

The court declared that the National Land Commission's actions were unconstitutional and that the petitioner should be allowed to keep the land.

Orders

  • The National Land Commission to provide a fair hearing to the petitioner
  • The National Land Commission to reverse its decision to revoke the petitioner's title

Remedies

  • Declaration that the National Land Commission's actions are unconstitutional
  • Declaration that the petitioner should be allowed to keep the land

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Article 47 of the Constitution of Kenya
  • Article 50 of the Constitution of Kenya
  • National Land Commission Act, 2012
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case