SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Samwel Orwa Wayuga v Church Commissioners of Kenya of The Anglican Church of Kenya [2017] KEELC 189 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 189 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
189
Citation
[2017] KEELC 189 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a judgment of the Environment and Land Court at KisiiCoramJ. Mutungi, S. Okongo
Holding

The court extended the period of suspension of the permanent injunction for sixty (60) days from the date of the judgment.

Facts

The Plaintiff, Samwel Orwa Wayuga, sought a permanent injunction against the Defendant, The Church Commissioners of Kenya of the Anglican Church of Kenya, to prevent them from carrying out certain activities on his land. The Defendant applied for a stay of execution of the judgment pending an appeal to the Court of Appeal.

Issues

  1. Whether to grant a stay of execution of the judgment pending the appeal
  2. Whether to extend the period of suspension of the permanent injunction

Reasoning

The court found that the Defendant is a religious organization bound to suffer irreparable harm if the suspended permanent injunction is not extended, and the reasons given by the Defendant's counsel for the delay in the typing of proceedings for the preparation of the record of appeal were considered.

Outcome

The court granted the application for an extension of the period of suspension of the permanent injunction.

Orders

  • Extension of the period of suspension of the permanent injunction for sixty (60) days from the date of the judgment

Remedies

  • Extension of the period of suspension of the permanent injunction

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Giella v Cassaman Brown (1973) EA 358
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case