SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

James Thendu Gitau & another v John Nginga Magecha [2020] KEELC 2263 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 2263 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
2263
Citation
[2020] KEELC 2263 (KLR)
Decided
4 June 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureAppeal from a ruling of a Senior Principal MagistrateCoramL. GACHERU
Holding

The appeal is partially allowed, with costs to the Appellants, and a temporary injunction is issued against the Defendant/Respondent, his agents, servants, and anyone claiming under him from excavating building materials, digging, charging, leasing, selling, and interfering with the land parcels pending the hearing and determination of the suit.

Facts

The Plaintiffs/Appellants were the registered owners of land parcels Ngenda/Wamawangi/904 and Ngenda/Wamwangi/903. The Defendant/Respondent had been trespassing and unlawfully excavating building materials from the land.

Issues

  1. Whether the ruling of the lower court should be set aside
  2. Whether the Plaintiffs/Appellants' application should be allowed
  3. Whether the Defendant/Respondent should be ordered to desist from carrying out activities that would degrade the land

Reasoning

The court finds that the lower court erred in its findings and misapprehended the facts and evidence on record. The status quo should remain as it existed before the unlawful actions of the Defendant/Respondent.

Outcome

The appeal is partially allowed, with costs to the Appellants.

Orders

  • A temporary injunction is issued against the Defendant/Respondent, his agents, servants, and anyone claiming under him from excavating building materials, digging, charging, leasing, selling, and interfering with the land parcels Ngenda/Wamawangi/904 and Ngenda/Wamwangi/903 pending the hearing and determination of the suit.
  • The Defendant/Respondent is allowed entry to continue in occupation and cultivation of the suit properties.

Remedies

  • Preservatory orders pending the hearing of the matter as the Respondent would not suffer any prejudice.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case