SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

James Gichuhi Mutero & another v Lolldaiga Country Homes and Golf Resort Ltd and Directors of Lolldaiga Country Homes and Golf Resort Limited; Amos Gichuku Ngonjo & 2 others (Interested parties) [2021] KEELC 1217 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 1217 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
1217
Citation
[2021] KEELC 1217 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureApplication for setting aside ex-parte judgment and notice to show causeCoramBC Harris, Harris, Kneller
Holding

The application is dismissed with costs.

Facts

The Plaintiffs, James Gichuhi Mutero and Joan Wairimu Mutero, instituted a suit against Lolldaiga Country Homes and Golf Resort Limited and its Directors. The suit was against the company and its directors in their personal capacity. The Plaintiffs were also the directors of the company.

Issues

  1. Whether the Applicants are parties to the suit
  2. Whether the notice to show cause and warrants of arrest are unlawful
  3. Whether the suit against the Interested Parties/Applicants is unlawful and grossly defective

Reasoning

The court finds it curious that the Applicants now claim not to have been parties to the suit. The Plaintiffs, who are the directors of the company, fully participated in the proceedings leading to the impugned judgment. The court declines to exercise its discretion to set aside the judgment as the application is an attempt to evade, obstruct, or delay the cause of justice.

Outcome

Application dismissed

Orders

  • The notice to show cause against the Applicants herein and any consequential orders following therefrom are set aside and the matter is set down for hearing inter partes.
  • The Judgement and decree herein and any consequential orders flowing therefrom against the Interested Parties/Applicants are set aside and the matter is set down for hearing inter partes.
  • The costs of this application are borne by the Respondents/Plaintiffs.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case