SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Elizabeth Kairigo v M’Ikiao Amuru & 6 others [2021] KEELC 1977 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 1977 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
1977
Citation
[2021] KEELC 1977 (KLR)
Decided
22 September 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureAppeal from the ruling of the learned magistrate Hon. SOGOMO in Tigania ELC No. 1 of 2017CoramHON. LUCY. N. MBUGUA, ELC JUDGE
Holding

The appeal is allowed and the suit before the trial court is reinstated.

Facts

The appellant, Elizabeth Kairigo, sued the respondents for a declaration that the defendants hold land in Uringu ii Land Adjudication Section measuring 36 acres as initially gathered by an adjudication officer.

Issues

  1. Whether the trial court dismissed the appellant's suit incorrectly.
  2. Whether the trial court had the requisite jurisdiction to hear and determine the appellant's suit.

Reasoning

The court determined that the trial court had not properly considered the appellant's objections and that the trial court lacked the requisite jurisdiction to hear the suit.

Outcome

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • The lower court file is to be forthwith transmitted to Tigania law court for determination of the case on merits.
  • Each party to bear their own costs of this appeal.

Remedies

  • Reinstatement of the suit before the trial court

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Land Adjudication Act
  • Land Consolidation Act
Cases cited (4)
  • Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co. Ltd vs West End Distributors ltd (1969) EA 696
  • Johnson Mbaabu Mburugu & another v Mathiu Nabea & 9 others [2020] eKLR
  • Reuben Mwongela M’itelekwa (suing as the Legal Representative of the estate of M’itelekwa M’mucheke Naituri alias M’itelekwa Mucheke) v Paul Kigea Nabea & 2 others [2019] eKLR
  • Julius Kailikia Laaru v Peter Kaigera Laaru [2020] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case