SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mepukori Pere v Samuel Gicheru & another [2021] KEELC 1984 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 1984 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
1984
Citation
[2021] KEELC 1984 (KLR)
Decided
16 September 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from an original trial judgmentCoramPresiding Judge
Holding

The Court found that the Defendants are in possession of the suit land and owe rent arrears, and since there is no subsisting lease, the Plaintiff is entitled to an eviction order.

Facts

The Plaintiff, Mepukori Pere, claimed ownership of land parcel NGONG/NGONG/57649 in Magadi Road, Ongata Rongai. He alleged that the Defendants, Samuel Gicheru and Endolvine Investment Limited, had breached a lease agreement by defaulting on rent payments and failing to vacate the property.

Issues

  1. Whether an eviction order should issue against the Defendants
  2. Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to recovery of rent arrears
  3. Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to General Damages and Mesne Profits
  4. Who should bear the costs of the suit

Reasoning

The Court relied on Section 60 of the Land Act, which states that a lessee's obligations continue until they cease to be in possession of the land. The Defendants' failure to vacate the property and pay rent arrears, despite being directed to do so, led to the Court's decision.

Outcome

The Plaintiff's application for an eviction order was granted.

Orders

  • An eviction order against the Defendants jointly and severally from all that parcel of land known as Land Reference Number NGONG/NGONG/57649

Remedies

  • Recovery of outstanding rent arrears
  • Mesne profits to be assessed by the Hon. Court
  • General damages
  • Costs of the suit

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Land Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case