SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Damarice Njeri Kaniaru v Daniel Mbugua Mwangi & another; Titus Kamanja Kaniaru (Intended Substituted Party/Applicant) [2021] KEELC 2096 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 2096 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
2096
Citation
[2021] KEELC 2096 (KLR)
Decided
23 July 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeSubstitution of PlaintiffPostureApplication for substitution of Plaintiff by Intended Substituted Party/ApplicantCoramDEFENDANT, TITUS KAMAN
Holding

The court finds that the Plaintiff is competent to testify in court and is not fit to be substituted by the Intended Substituted Party/Applicant.

Facts

The Plaintiff is the mother of the Intended Substituted Party/Applicant and is aged 93 years old. She has been suffering from ill health and is described as senile and unable to prosecute the suit.

Issues

  1. Whether the Plaintiff is competent to testify in court
  2. Whether the Plaintiff is fit to be substituted by the Intended Substituted Party/Applicant

Reasoning

The court relies on Section 125 of the Evidence Act and Order 32 Rule 14 of the Civil Procedure Rules to determine that the Plaintiff is competent to testify. The court also considers the Mental Health Act, Cap 248, but finds that the Plaintiff is not fit to be substituted.

Outcome

The application for substitution of the Plaintiff is dismissed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Evidence Act, Cap 80
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010
  • Mental Health Act, Cap 248
Cases cited (2)
  • M MM –V- A M K [2016] e KLR
  • ELC case no 520 of 2012 Eldoret, Isaac Kipkemboi Chesire & 4 others versus Joseph Kimitei Kwamboi & 3 others and Rose Cheruiyot Rono & 3 others interested parties
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case