SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mbiiri Kamau (Representing A.C.K Kitharaini Church, the Church Commissioners for Kenya Trustees of the Anglican Church of Kenya) v Munyangia Njoka & 2 others [2021] KEELC 2116 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 2116 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
2116
Citation
[2021] KEELC 2116 (KLR)
Decided
23 July 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand Registration DisputePostureAppeal from a judgment of the Environment and Land CourtCoramE.C. Cherono
Holding

The Court finds that the Plaintiff has failed to defend the manner in which the suit property was acquired and that the veil of indefeasibility of title has been successfully pierced by the 1st Defendant. As such, the reliefs sought by the Plaintiff cannot be granted.

Facts

The Plaintiff, acting on behalf of A.C.K Kitharaini Church and the Church Commissioners for Kenya Trustees of the Anglican Church of Kenya, filed a suit against the Land Registrar and the Attorney General. The Plaintiff claimed that their title to a parcel of land was cancelled without due process.

Issues

  1. Whether the Plaintiffs have locus standi to institute the suit.
  2. Whether the cancellation of the Plaintiff’s title from the registrar followed due process.
  3. Whether the Plaintiff is an innocent purchaser for value.
  4. Whether the reliefs sought by the Plaintiff can be granted.

Reasoning

The court held that the Plaintiff did not have locus standi due to the amendment of the plaint, and that the cancellation of the title was not in accordance with due process. The court also found that the Plaintiff was not an innocent purchaser for value.

Outcome

The appeal is dismissed. The Land Registrar is directed to cancel the Plaintiff's title and maintain the 1st Defendant's name as the registered proprietor.

Orders

  • The Land Registrar is directed to cancel the Plaintiff's title and maintain the 1st Defendant's name as the registered proprietor.
  • The 1st Defendant shall have the costs of this suit.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Mumo Matemu Vs Trusted Society of Human Rights Alliance & 5 others [2014] e KLR
  • Gitwany Investment Limited Vs Tajmal Limited & 3 others [2006] e K.L.R
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case