SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Joshua Chegenjoroge v Ann Wanjirumwaura & Virginia Wambuimwaura (Environment & Land Case 201 of 2017) [2021] KEELC 2169 (KLR) (29 July 2021) (Ruling)

[2021] KEELC 2169 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
2169
Citation
[2021] KEELC 2169 (KLR)
Decided
29 July 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeSubstitution and Abatement of SuitPostureApplication for substitution of parties and determination of abatement of suit
Holding

The application for substitution is defective, incompetent and bad in law. The suit has abated and the costs incurred by the defendants in defending the suit are to be recovered from the estate of the deceased plaintiff.

Facts

The deceased plaintiff, Joshua Chegenjoroge, filed a plaint seeking various reliefs against the defendants. The suit was declared abated due to the death of the deceased plaintiff and the failure to make an application for substitution within one year.

Issues

  1. Whether the application for substitution is defective, incompetent and bad in law.
  2. Whether the suit has abated and, if so, what is the consequence thereof.

Reasoning

The court found the application for substitution lacking in evidence and procedural compliance. The suit abated due to the failure to make an application for substitution within one year of the deceased plaintiff's death.

Outcome

The application for substitution is dismissed, and the suit is declared abated.

Orders

  • The application for substitution is dismissed.
  • The suit is declared abated.
  • The costs incurred by the defendants in defending the suit are to be recovered from the estate of the deceased plaintiff.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
  • Environment and Land Court Act 2011
Cases cited (1)
  • Rebecca MijideMungole and Another v Kenya Power and Lighting Company Limited and 2 Others [2017] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case