SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

John Mark Wandolo v Paul Ng'ang'a Nage [2021] KEELC 2177 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 2177 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
2177
Citation
[2021] KEELC 2177 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureApplication for stay of execution pending appealCoramM. A. Odengo
Holding

The application for stay of execution is granted.

Facts

The defendant/applicant seeks a stay of execution of the judgment and decree of the Environment and Land Court Case No. 213 of 2014, and the consequential orders, pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant will suffer substantial loss if the orders are not granted.
  2. Whether the application was filed timeously.

Reasoning

The court finds that the applicant will suffer substantial loss if the orders are not granted, and that the application was filed timeously.

Outcome

The application for stay of execution is granted.

Orders

  • Stay of execution of the judgment and decree of the Environment and Land Court Case No. 213 of 2014, and the consequential orders, pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal.
  • Deposit the title to the suit land in court within the next 14 days and not to part with possession pending the hearing and determination of this suit.

Remedies

  • Preservation of the suit land.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (6)
  • C v. Stephen Reuben Karunditu
  • Carter & Sons Ltd v. Deposit Protection Fund Board
  • Socfinac Company Limited v. Nelphat Kimotho Muturi
  • Vishram Ravji Halai v. Thornton & Turpin
  • Regional Institute of Business Management v. Lucas Ondong' Otieno
  • Utalii Transport Company Limited & 3 others v. NIC Bank & Another
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case