SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Regina Gathoni v Samuel Wainaina Githacuri [2021] KEELC 2204 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 2204 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
2204
Citation
[2021] KEELC 2204 (KLR)
Decided
9 August 2021
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeAppealPostureAppellant seeks enlargement of time to file an appeal and a stay of orders pending hearing and determination of the appeal.CoramK. BOR
The court grants the orders sought in the application dated 16/11/2020. The Applicant will file and serve her appeal within 30 days of the date of this ruling.

Facts

Appellant brought an application for enlargement of time to file an appeal against a ruling by the Senior Principal Magistrate in Kikuyu Principal Magistrates’ Court Suit No. 25 of 2020. The Respondent filed an application for an injunction seeking to restrain the Appellant and the County Government of Kiambu from dealing with the Suit Property.

Issues

  • Whether the court should stay the orders issued by the Learned Magistrate on 30/7/2020.
  • Whether the court should enlarge the time for the Appellant to lodge her appeal.

Reasoning

The court notes that the orders restraining the Appellant from dealing with the Suit Property ought not to have issued against her if she does not own land next to the Respondent's land. The court grants the stay of the orders pending the determination of whether there was encroachment on the Respondent's land.

Outcome

The court grants the stay of the orders pending the determination of whether there was encroachment on the Respondent's land.

Orders

  • The court grants the orders sought in the application dated 16/11/2020. The Applicant will file and serve her appeal within 30 days of the date of this ruling.
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case