SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Agnes Wambui Kiritu & another v Nicasio Murithi & 3 others [2021] KEELC 2315 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 2315 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
2315
Citation
[2021] KEELC 2315 (KLR)
Decided
22 July 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand SuitPostureAppeal from the original trialCoramJohn Ngugi Wan
Holding

The court found the Plaintiffs to be the lawful proprietors of the suit property and the Defendants to be trespassers. The Plaintiffs are entitled to the reliefs sought.

Facts

The Plaintiffs, Agnes Wambui Kiritu and Esther Njeri Karogo, claimed to be the lawful proprietors of the suit property (Title No. Nairobi/Block 126/83) in Kamulu, Nairobi. They alleged that the Defendants, Nicasio Murithi, Farrowson Murithi Gichovi, Samuel Mwangi Thuo, and John Ngugi Wanja, entered and occupied the property without their consent and constructed permanent structures on it.

Issues

  1. Whether the Defendants are trespassers on the suit property
  2. Whether the Plaintiffs are entitled to the reliefs sought

Reasoning

The Plaintiffs established they were the lawful proprietors of the suit property and the Defendants had entered and put up structures thereon without their permission. The Defendants did not provide any evidence to justify their occupation, thus they are found to be trespassers.

Outcome

The Plaintiffs are entitled to a declaration that they are the bona fide proprietors of the suit property, an order for the Defendants to demolish the permanent houses on the property, and general damages for trespass and unlawful occupation.

Orders

  • The Defendants are ordered to demolish the permanent houses on the suit property

Remedies

  • General damages for trespass and unlawful occupation of the suit property

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Registered Land Act, 1930
  • Land Registration Act, 2012
Cases cited (1)
  • Gitwany Investments Limited v Tajmal Limited & 3 others [2006] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case