SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mary Wangui Njagi v Nancy Wanjira Njagi & 2 others [2021] KEELC 2409 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 2409 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
2409
Citation
[2021] KEELC 2409 (KLR)
Decided
11 June 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeContempt of CourtPostureApplication for contempt of courtCoramL., Lenaola, Thesinger L.
Holding

The court found that the third respondent, Jane Wanjiru Njagi, had disobeyed a court order and ordered her to be detained in prison for a term not exceeding six months.

Facts

The applicant, Mary Wangui Njagi, sought an order for the third respondent, Jane Wanjiru Njagi, to be detained in prison for six months for disobeying a court order issued on September 18, 2020, which restrained the third respondent from interfering with the land parcel KABARE/GACHIGI/2380. The third respondent, Jane Wanjiru Njagi, argued that she was present in court when the order was pronounced and that she had not disobeyed the court order.

Issues

  1. Contempt of court
  2. Obeying court orders

Reasoning

The court applied the applicable English Law on contempt of court, as per the Judicature Act, to uphold the authority and dignity of the court. The court emphasized the importance of obeying court orders and the consequences of disobeying them.

Outcome

The third respondent, Jane Wanjiru Njagi, was ordered to be detained in prison for a term not exceeding six months.

Orders

  • Detention of the third respondent in prison for a term not exceeding six months

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Judicature Act
  • Contempt of Court Act
Cases cited (3)
  • Christine Wangari Gachege v Elizabeth Wanjiru Evans & 11 others (2014) e KLR
  • Patrick Wanyonyi Munialo v County Executive Committee (2019) e KLR
  • Shimmers Plaza Limited v National Bank of Kenya Ltd (2015) e KRL
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case