SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Attorney General & 2 others Ex parte Liston Mutuma Kiunga; Josphat David Mwilaria (Intersted party) [2021] KEELC 2637 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 2637 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
2637
Citation
[2021] KEELC 2637 (KLR)
Decided
14 July 2021
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

The ex parte applicant's mandamus application is dismissed as the Land Consolidation Act does not provide for an appeal after the objection cases are conducted.

Facts

The ex parte applicant filed an objection case against Zakayo M'Marimba, which was dismissed. The interested party later filed an application seeking to have the consent judgment set aside and to participate in the proceedings. The ex parte applicant then filed a mandamus application to compel the Land Adjudication Officer to register the land in his name.

Issues

  • Whether the mandamus order to compel the Land Adjudication Officer to register the suit land in the ex parte applicant's name is warranted.
  • Whether the consent judgment should be set aside and the interested party allowed to participate in the proceedings.

Reasoning

The court found that Moses Thuranira, who represented Zakayo M'Marimba in the objection case, had recanted his evidence two years after the case was dismissed. The court ruled that the Land Consolidation Act does not allow for an appeal after the objection cases are conducted.

Outcome

The ex parte applicant's mandamus application is dismissed.

⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case