SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Esther Kathambi Delfin v M’ibeere Karaine [2021] KEELC 286 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 286 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
286
Citation
[2021] KEELC 286 (KLR)
Decided
20 December 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureApplication for stay of execution of decree and inhibition orderCoramHON. C.K. NZILI, Karuti, Abwour
Holding

The court ordered a stay of execution of the decree and an inhibition order over the title, with the property remaining under the respondent's name for six months. The applicant must surrender the original title deed to the Deputy Registrar within 14 days.

Facts

The plaintiff, Esther Kathambi Delfin, applied for a stay of execution of a decree issued on 22.9.2021 pending appeal, and an inhibition order over title No. Ex-Lewa Settlement Scheme/698. The decree was executed on 22.11.2021. The plaintiff claimed substantial loss due to the likelihood of alienation of the suit land to third parties, while the defendant, M’ibeere Karaine, opposed the application, citing his long-term occupation of the land and the lack of substantial loss.

Issues

  1. Demonstration of substantial loss
  2. Offer for security and an undertaking as to costs
  3. Arguable appeal

Reasoning

The court found no substantial loss demonstrated by the plaintiff, and the defendant's long-term occupation of the land. The court also noted the lack of a draft memorandum of appeal and the need for a reasonable proposal for security and an undertaking as to costs.

Outcome

The application was denied.

Orders

  • Stay of execution of decree pending appeal
  • Inhibition order over title No. Ex-Lewa Settlement Scheme/698

Remedies

  • Preservation of the suit land under the respondent's name for six months

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Constitution of Kenya
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case