SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

John Muikamba Gitau v Trustees Caritas Mariana Holy Family Children’s Home & another [2021] KEELC 2920 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 2920 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
2920
Citation
[2021] KEELC 2920 (KLR)
Decided
17 June 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeNotice of Motion ApplicationPostureDefendants/Applicants seek leave to file and serve their statement of defence out of time.
Holding

The Court finds and holds that in the interest of justice, the Defendants/Applicants will be allowed to file their Defence.

Facts

The Defendants/Applicants filed a Notice of Motion Application on 23rd June 2020, seeking leave to file their statement of defence out of time. The Plaintiff/Respondent filed a Replying Affidavit opposing the application.

Issues

  1. Defendants/Applicants' failure to file a statement of defence within the prescribed time
  2. Whether the Defendants/Applicants should be granted leave to file their statement of defence out of time

Reasoning

The Court exercised its discretion to grant leave to file the Defence, considering the nature of the case, the parties' lack of pre-trial directions, and the possibility of compensating the Plaintiff/Respondent for the delay.

Outcome

The Defendants/Applicants will be allowed to file their Defence.

Orders

  • Defendants/Applicants to file and serve their statement of defence and witness statements out of time

Remedies

  • Defendants/Applicants to pay costs to the Plaintiff/Respondent

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Cases cited (2)
  • Gerald Mwithia vs Meru College of Technology & Another (2018) eKLR
  • Sebel District Administration vs Gasyali & Others (1968) E.A. 300
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case