SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Peter Mujunga Gathuru v Harun Osoro Nyamboki & another [2021] KEELC 2945 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 2945 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
2945
Citation
[2021] KEELC 2945 (KLR)
Decided
6 May 2021
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from a previous ruling in a land dispute caseCoramKuloba
A temporary injunction is granted to restrain the Defendants from trespassing and constructing on the Plaintiff's land, and to demolish the gate and wall.

Facts

The Plaintiff, Peter Mujunga Gathuru, claimed that the Defendants, Harun Osoro Nyamboki and NESCO Services Limited, had encroached onto his land and constructed a gate and wall, preventing him from accessing the land. The Plaintiff had previously filed a HCCC No. 2874 of 1997, which was decided by Kuloba J. in 1999, declining to grant specific performance.

Issues

  • Whether the Defendants' encroachment on the Plaintiff's land constitutes a trespass
  • Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to a temporary injunction to prevent further encroachment and to have the gate and wall demolished

Reasoning

The court found that the Plaintiff is the legal and beneficial owner of the land and that the Defendants' actions have interfered with his quiet use and possession of the land.

Outcome

The Plaintiff's application for a temporary injunction is granted.

Orders

  • Temporary injunction to restrain Defendants from trespassing and constructing on the Plaintiff's land
  • Demolition of the gate and wall on the Plaintiff's land

Remedies

  • Demolition of the gate and wall on the Plaintiff's land
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case