Leruk Murusi & 14 others v County Government of Marsabit & 3 others [2021] KEELC 3193 (KLR)
- Court
- Environment & Land Court
- Case number
- 3193
- Citation
- [2021] KEELC 3193 (KLR)
- Decided
- 26 May 2021
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from an order granting a status quo injunctionCoramMurithi
Holding
The court issues an order for status quo to be maintained on the ground that it is in the interests of justice.
Facts
The petitioners sought an order for status quo to be maintained pending the hearing and determination of the pending applications. The court had previously dealt with the issue of interim conservatory orders.
Issues
- The petitioners' request for an order for status quo to be maintained pending the hearing and determination of the pending applications.
- The distinction between an order for status quo and an injunction.
Reasoning
The court finds that the petitioners' request for an order for status quo is justified given the ongoing nature of the proceedings and the need to preserve the status quo pending the hearing and determination of the pending applications.
Outcome
The court issues an order for status quo to be maintained.
Orders
- Order for status quo to be maintained
Remedies
- Status quo maintained
Authorities cited
Legislation (3)
- Community Land Act 2016
- Wildlife and Conservation Act 2013
- Constitution of Kenya Protection of Rights and Fundamental Freedoms Practice and Procedure Rules
Cases cited (1)
- Mombasa Misc. Civil Application (JR) No.26 of 2010 Republic –vs- The Chairperson Business Premises Rent Tribunal at Mombasa (Bench Mochache) Exparte Baobab Beach Resort
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…